Exploring the End Times Theorem

Abstract:
Introduction to End Times Theory
 Identifying and Establishing the Components of the End Times
Researched and Presented by Rev. Charles Lee White, PhD
February 10, 2017
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Identifying and Establishing 

the Components of End Times Theory


The academic research conducted for this educational report and the relative findings I am reporting on may support the educational goals and requirements for the completion and attainment of my Doctorate Degree in Metaphysical Philosophy and Comparative Religious Studies.
Through the development of this dissertation, I have achieved fulfillment in my journey and personal quest for clarity and interpretation regarding written biblical prophecy and modern End of Times Theory.

The ‘sequence of events’ presented theoretically in this report have been carefully studied and developed from my own independent research. The subject matter, assumptions, hypotheses and predictions ascertained and derived from these studies have revealed a very logically reasonable, useful and applicable approach towards the design of a foundational platform relative to the exploration and theoretical conceptualization of Modern Eschatology and End Times Theory.

The original theories involved from eschatological conceptualization have been propagated and cultivated in scientific methodology. These ideas support the chronological timeline I will introduce and utilize to determine the order of related events and the variable dependencies consistent to these important eschatological events.

With my own theoretical orientation and understanding of modern religion, I will share my expectations for the near future and identify the components of our evolving global environment and its effect on modern society. 

In all societies of humanity the demand and concern exists for the progressive development of a standard and universal timeline capable of determining a universal starting point or benchmark into the investigation of the claims and findings in the matter of End Times.

Most people want to know how and when they will perish or transcend to another level of existence.

The sources of indigenous information gathered from texts of Judaism and modern Christianity, the English-King James Version of the Holy Bible, the Hebrew Bible or Tanakh, the five books of the Torah and several other ancient texts that will be mentioned later.

In the formation and support of these scientific findings and conclusions personal bias or prejudice has been intentionally avoided. The performance of analytical procedure involved in the conclusiveness of the study along with the literal and logical conclusions will provide substantial support of the original development of these theories. All comparative methodology is absent prejudice or personal bias, any type of my own personal opinions, personalized spiritual views or metaphysical beliefs. Only the symbolic context of the allegorical passages and words written in the Bible and related texts have been utilized in basing my premise towards theories relevant to the matter of End Times.

Subjective and exploratory minded studies and discussion have created a formation of the key principles and elements necessary to build this foundation for research and theoretical development in the End Times concept that we are experiencing now and in the future years to come. This combination of common facts and elements has revealed a reasonable timeline of events derived from prophetic verses in the Bible and has placed them into their proper areas.

The primary concepts of this study are to explain and identify:

1) The Sequence of Major End Time Events,

2) The Destiny of the Three Components of Humanity,

3) The Purpose and Length of the Great Tribulation,

4) The Purpose of the Rapture,
5) The Conditions Surrounding
     the Second Coming,
6) The Purpose and Length of the Millennium, and

7) Eternity.


The Sequence of Major Events in End Times Theory:


Knowing the critical information of what happens and when

As confusing as it seems to initially appear, the sequence in which major End Times events will occur, actually comes in a very logical order.  I believe that the most appropriate method for arriving at this conclusion would be to figure out the outcome of events using a methodology known in the business world as a ‘back scheduling exercise.’ This process involves going to the very end of a process and identifying the ‘final outcome.’ All of the environmental variables dependent to producing that specified outcome require organization. By listing the processes or events that have to happen to produce the ‘final outcome’ and then taking these processes or events and putting them in reverse order, from backing into the present, we have established a methodology to build our timeline of events.
Most everyone is familiar with the Second Coming and Eternity. Many also have heard of the Rapture of the Church and the Great Tribulation.  There exists also the Millennial Kingdom, Daniel’s 70th Week, and the Battles of Ezekiel 38-39, Psalm 83 and Isaiah 17;  several  major events that have yet to transpire or come about. If we begin with the ‘final outcome’ and manage to work back toward the beginning of the list it appears like this:
Eternity is believed to be the ‘final outcome.’  Using the procedure that I have mentioned earlier,
The Kingdom Age or Millennium is the last event described in detail in the Bible. Eternity by definition means “the absence of time.”
The Bible states that the Lord’s 1000-year reign on Earth will precede Eternity. We can verify this by reading the very last chapter in the Book of Revelations. This final chapter speaks of trees on either side of the River of Life bearing a different fruit every month. In allegorical and linguistic terms this signifies that time still does exist.   Let it be said that Eternity cannot happen until the Millennium is over.
Furthermore, we are led to believe that the Millennium will not begin until after the Second Coming.  This is when the Lord will return to establish Heaven on Earth.
 In accordance with [Matt. 24:29-30] the Second Coming will not occur until the end of the Great Tribulation.
Chronologically this cannot take place until the Antichrist stands in the Temple in Israel declaring himself to be God. [2 Thes. 2:4]
This is the event that Jesus warned Israel to watch out for as the commencement of the Great Tribulation. It is referred to as “The Abomination of Desolation” in [Matt. 24:15-21.]
[Daniel 9:27] It is specifically indicates that  it will happen in the middle of the last seven year period, which scholars commonly refer to as Daniel’s 70th Week.
The Abomination of Desolation follows the construction of Israel’s Temple. Since nearly 70 AD the construction of a Temple in Israel has not been started or taken place, however there is word that the blueprints and that the engineering design for this project has been completed.   A Temple will be built when the Jews officially decide they need one.  Once God reinstates the Jew’s Old Covenant relationship then the need for a Temple will occur.  Most believe that the Temple’s main purpose will be to provide the Jews with the opportunity to worship God according to the Old Covenant requirements.
Upon completion of the Temple, the beginning of Daniel’s 70th week will commence.  According to scripture, The 70th Week will not begin until the Battle of [Ezekiel 38-39] ends favorably for the Jews. God will then use that battle to awaken Israel and reinstate His covenant with them.
In [Romans 11:25] Paul said Israel has been hardened in part until the full number of Gentiles has come in, a reference to the rapture of the Church, after which Israel will be saved.  Understand that this means that the rapture has to happen before the Battle of Ezekiel 38.

The “Sequence of Major Events” in their proper chronological order:
The Rapture of the Church
The Battle of Ezekiel 38
Daniel’s 70th week begins
The Great Tribulation
The Second Coming
The Millennium
Eternity
The ones familiar with written Scripture may believe that the timing of two of these events are somewhat debatable.  These two less obvious events are the Rapture of the Church and the Battle of Ezekiel 38, which are the first two events on the list we created. As we explore these chronological events we will put them in their respective order and proper sequence. Using our previous approach of back scheduling allows us to begin with Ezekiel’s battle and work back to the Rapture.
“And I will set my glory among the nations, and all the nations shall see my judgment that I have executed, and my hand that I have laid on them. The house of Israel shall know that I am the LORD their God, from that day forward.
Then they shall know that I am the LORD their God, because I sent them into exile among the nations and then assembled them into their own land. I will leave none of them remaining among the nations anymore. And I will not hide my face anymore from them, when I pour out my Spirit upon the house of Israel, declares the Lord GOD.” (Ezek 39:21-22, 28-29)

The Lord has declared that He will use Ezekiel’s battle to spiritually awaken His people and to call them to Israel from all parts of the world. This will result in the reinstatement of their Old Covenant relationship, reviving Daniel’s long dormant “70-Weeks” prophecy for its final seven years and requiring the construction of a holy Temple.

Without either one of these events occurring, the Jews will not be able to keep the Lord’s covenant.
Historically, this was proven during the captivity of Babylon. It occurred at the time that Nebuchadnezzar destroyed the First Temple causing the annihilation and extinction of Israel. Scripture indicates that upon Cyrus the Persian defeating Babylon and freeing the Jews, that the Jews immediately began building the Temple upon their return to Israel. There can be no sacrifice for sin unless the Temple is in existence and without this sacrifice; Jews apparently are not able to approach God.

Both the Old and New Testaments refer to a Temple in Israel at the End of the Age. The only reason for a Temple is to perform the Old Covenant ordinances. If a group considered starting to build a Temple today, it would cause a huge uproar and most likely the occurrence of more aggressive attacks on one another from the Jews and Muslims.  There must be a unified demand from the people of Israel accompanied by acceptance from the Muslims before the construction of a Temple is ever even fathomable. Allow me to elaborate on this concept.
 Ezekiel’s battle must result in the reawakening of the Jewish nation of Israel to the presence of God in their national life. In return, the Muslims must be defeated and deterred from resisting the progress of the Jews in building their Temple of Old Covenant Worship.
Once these events are set in place, the perfect conditions will finally exist to start the building of the Temple. For these reasons, Ezekiel’s battle has to take place on the threshold of Daniel’s 70th week.

The Rapture of the Church logically has to occur after Ezekiel’s Battle
Lest you be wise in your own conceits, I want you to understand this mystery, brothers: a partial hardening has come upon Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles has come in. (Romans 11:25)
According to[ Ezek. 37:7-10]  Israel would be reborn first in unbelief.  Paul said they’ll remain partially estranged from God until the gentile Church reaches its full complement (predetermined number) and arrives at its destination. (The Greek word translated “fullness” in Romans 11:25 was a nautical term often used to describe the full complement of crew and cargo necessary to accomplish a ship’s mission. The ship couldn’t sail till those requirements were met. The one translated “come in” means to arrive at a designated place.)
The veil will then be pulled back as God reveals Himself to them again. As we saw above, He will use Ezekiel’s battle to begin this by renewing the Old Covenant with them, later transitioning Israel from the Old Covenant to the New toward the end of the Great Tribulation (Zech 12:10).  Remember, if the Jews  have not returned back to the Old covenant, they wouldn’t need a Temple.

After they finished speaking, James replied, “Brothers, listen to me. Simeon has related how God first visited the Gentiles, to take from them a people for his name. And with this the words of the prophets agree, just as it is written,
‘After this I will return, and I will rebuild the tent of David that has fallen; I will rebuild its ruins, and I will restore it, that the remnant of mankind may seek the Lord, and all the Gentiles who are called by my name, says the Lord, who makes these things known from of old.’ (Acts 15:13-18)

Nearly twenty years after the cross or the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, a common controversy arose as to whether the Gentiles had to become Jews before they could become Christians.  If not, what would become of Israel? In effect, the Lord’s brother James explained to the Apostles and others present at the Council of Jerusalem that Israel was being temporarily set aside while God focused on the Church. After He had taken this “people for His name” (Christians) from among the Gentiles he would return and rebuild His Temple. (The Greek words translated taken means to carry something away or remove it from its place, so the passage implies that He would take the Church somewhere and then come back to rebuild the Temple, restore Israel, and give what’s left of mankind one final chance to seek Him).
These three Bible prophecies make it clear that as the End of the Age approaches, God will begin preparing Israel to be His once more. However, He will not be exclusively focused on them until He has finished building the Church and has taken us to our appointed place. And where is that?
In my Father’s house are many rooms; if it were not so, I would have told you. I am going there to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with me that you also may be where I am. (John 14:2-3) (He didn’t promise to come back to be with us here where we are, but to take us there, where He is.)  After that He would see to Israel’s reawakening and the construction of their Temple.

Throughout Scripture, the Lord seems to be involved with either Israel or the Church, but never both at the same time. James bears this out in his pronouncement regarding the Church in [Acts 15.]  All the leaders of the early church now knew that once God had accomplished His goals with the church, He would turn again to Israel, and that would signal the End of the Church Age.
There are two critical points to remember here.  The first is that the Church didn’t end the Age of Law, but only interrupted it 7 years short of its scheduled completion.  Those seven years, called the 70th Week of Daniel, have to be fulfilled to complete the Old Covenant. Secondly, the Old and New covenants, as practiced in Israel and the Church, are theologically incompatible, and therefore the two can only be on Earth at the same time while Israel is out of covenant. For Israel to return to the Lord, the Church has to be gone. For this reason, the rebirth of Israel in 1948 and the reunification of Jerusalem in 1967 are seen as the two most important signs of all that the End of the Age is upon us.

Two events not put into our sequence are the battles of [Psalm 83] and [ Isaiah 17].   When Israel wins these two battles all their next door enemies will be defeated and they will enter into a brief period of peace that sets the stage for Ezekiel’s Battle (Ezekiel 38:11).   These conflicts will come either before or after the Rapture, but do have to happen before the Battle of Ezekiel 38 takes place.

The Sequence of Major Events are only the tip of the iceberg in reference to having complete knowledge of the major prophetic events that are still to come.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Eschatology begins with an understanding of dispensationalism. which is the system of historical progression, as revealed in the Bible, consisting of a system of stages (or dispensations) in God’s self-revelation and plan of salvation. The ability to interpret biblical scripture is a fundamental concept that every person Some issues that we as Christians face regarding the topic of biblical interpretation include: How does divine inspiration and human authorship affect biblical interpretation? What does a text mean? What are some general principles of interpretation? How do we interpret the Old Testament? How do we interpret the New Testament? These are all critical questions for us to consider as we seek to become better interpreters of God’s word, the Bible. General Principles of Biblical Interpretation Principle 1: Interpretation must be based on the author’s intention of meaning and not the reader. This means we must get into the author’s context, historically, grammatically, culturally and the literary forms and conventions the author was working in. Principle 2: Interpretations must be done in the context of the passage. Principle 3: Interpret the Bible literally (or normally) allowing for normal use of figurative language. Principle 4: Use the Bible to help interpret itself. Interpret difficult passages with clear ones. This is sometimes called the law of non-contradiction. Because the Bible is God’s word, and God is true, the Bible will not contradict itself Principle 5: Interpretation must be distinguished from application. While there is one interpretation that is historical, there are many applications that can be carried over to our modern context. Build an application bridge from the interpretation to the timeless principle and then to the application now. Principle 6: Be sensitive to distinctions between Israel and the church and Old Covenant and New Covenant eras/requirements. Promises made to Israel in the Old Testament cannot automatically be transferred to the church in which we are a part. Principle 7: Be sensitive to the type of literature you are in. The Bible contains many different types of literature: law, narrative, wisdom, poetry, gospel, parable, epistle, and apocalyptic. Each of these types of literature has specific features that must be considered when interpreting a text. Interpreting the Old Testament Narrative Literature: Much of the Old Testament contains narrative literature. First, the passage needs to be interpreted in its historical context and then applications can be drawn from the characters and events. Law: Realize that Christians are not under the law as a legal system (Rom 6:14) but that we are to fulfill the principles that stand behind the law of loving God and loving one’s neighbor (cf. Matt 22:37-40)? In general, if the Old Testament command in the law is not repeated in the New Testament, look for the principle behind the statement in the law and then try to apply that. Wisdom Literature: Realize that much of the proverbial type of wisdom in the Old Testament is general truth based on observations but not absolute truths or promises. Poetry: Realize that poetry often has a greater use of figurate language than narrative or law. Also, Hebrew poetry’s main characteristic is parallelism. Interpreting the New Testament Gospels: Understand that each writer has a specific audience for whom he is writing, and that he has selected his material for them. Matthew was written for a Jewish audience. Mark was written for a Roman audience. Luke was written for a Greek audience. John was written for a universal or Gentile audience. This can help us see nuances or explain differences between accounts. For example, in Matthew 19:1-12 and Mark 10:1-12 Jesus teaches on the hard topic of divorce. Both gospels state that a man who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her. Mark alone though adds the point that if a woman divorces her husband and marries another she commits adultery against him. Why is this difference there? It probably has to do with the audience. Matthew is writing to a Jewish culture in which a woman could not divorce her husband while Mark is writing to a Roman audience in which one could. Read the gospels not only vertically, that is, understanding what is said in each individual account, but also horizontally, that is, considering why one account follows another. For example, see Mark 2-3:6; what do these various accounts have in common? One can notice that they are all different stories that relate to the conflict that Jesus had with the Jewish leadership. Mark 3:6 reads, “So the Pharisees went out immediately and began plotting with the Herodians as to how they could assassinate him.” The stories are grouped in a way that gives an explanation as to why Jesus was rejected as strongly as he was. Lastly, recognize that the gospels are in a transitional stage between Old and New Covenants. Jesus lived in the context of Judaism prior to the birth of the church. For example, Jesus is keeping the Old Testament prescribed feasts in many of his journeys to Jerusalem. Also, he is introducing changes that will be inaugurated with the start of the New Covenant. For example, in Mark 7 Jesus declared all foods clean which was a change from the Old Testament dietary laws.4 Parables.5 Parables are a form of figurative speech. They are stories that are used to illustrate a truth. There are parables in different parts of the Bible but Jesus was the master of them and many are found in the gospels (e.g., Matt 13, Mark 4, Luke 15). How then should we interpret the parables? First, determine the context that prompted the parable. Parables always arise out of a context. For example the Pharisees disdain for Jesus eating with tax collectors and sinners prompts Jesus to tell a parable about how God loves a lost sinner who repents (Luke 15). Second, understand the story’s natural meaning which is often taken from real life situations in first century Palestine. Third, ascertain the main point or truth the parable is trying to give and focus on this. Only interpret the details of the parables if they can be validated from the passage. Many details are there only for the setting of the story. For example, what is the main point of the mustard seed parable? Jesus stated: “The kingdom of heaven is like a mustard seed that a man took and sowed in his field. It is the smallest of all the seeds, but when it has grown it is the greatest garden plant and becomes a tree, so that the wild birds come and nest in its branches” (Matt 13:31-32). The parable is an illustration of the kingdom of heaven which starts small but grows to be very large in size. This seems to be the main point. The birds and the branches are probably there only to illustrate how large the tree has become. Acts. Recognize that Acts is a theologized history of the early church. Acts tells what the church was doing from the human side of things and what God was doing from the divine side of things. For example, consider these passages on the early growth of the church which refer to the same event but from two different perspectives. “So those who accepted his message were baptized, and that day about three thousand people were added”. . . . (Acts 2:41) “And the Lord was adding to their number everyday those who were being saved” (Acts 2:47). Here we see what God is doing in and through the church. Also, we need to recognize that the church starts in Acts 2 with the baptism of the Holy Spirit. The baptism of the Spirit, the filling of the Spirit, church planting and gospel outreach characterize the events of the book. In addition, some events in Acts are descriptive of what happened not proscriptive of what is necessarily expected in the modern church. For example, Samaritan believers did not receive the Holy Spirit in Acts 8 upon faith in Jesus. They had to wait for Peter and John to get there. When Paul was bitten by a viper in Malta, yet he miraculously lived (Acts 28:1-5). These are descriptions of what happened and are not necessarily normative of what happens in the church today. So it probably would not be a good idea to start snake handling services! The book of Acts is also a book of transitions. First there are key transitions in biography. This is especially true as the book focuses more on the ministry of Peter in the first portions of the book then shifts to Paul. There is also a transition in ministry focus from the Jews to the Samaritans and to the Gentiles. Lastly there is a geographical transition starting in Jerusalem taking the gospel outward into Samaria, Asia Minor, Europe and eventually Rome. In Acts 1:8Luke gives us a rough outline of the progression emphasizing the progress of the gospel. “But you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you, and you will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the farthest parts of the earth." Epistles. Since the New Testament epistles are directed to churches and individuals in the church, they most directly apply to us today. Most commands given in the epistles are general enough in nature that we need to obey them, or in the case of promises we can claim them. For example in 1 Corinthians 15 there is a promise given for immortal bodies and eventual victory over death. These promises are not just for those in the local Corinthian church but the universal church of God. In the epistles, pay special attention to logical connectors/conjunctions to explore relationships of clauses and sentences. Look for these types of words: “for, “therefore,” “but,” etc. For example Hebrews 12:1 reads, “Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, we must get rid of every weight and the sin that clings so closely, and run with endurance the race set out for us.” The word therefore points back to the previous chapter in which Old Testament saints were held up as people who had given a good testimony or witness of faith. The phrase “cloud of witnesses” then would naturally refer back to the people of the preceding chapter. In another example the author of Hebrews writes, “So since we are receiving an unshakable kingdom, let us give thanks, and through this let us offer worship pleasing to God in devotion and awe. For our God is indeed a devouring fire” (Heb 12:28-29). Here the word for sets up a subordinate idea giving the reason we as Christians should offer worship in devotion and awe to God. Revelation. Revelation is the one book in the New Testament that is one of the hardest to interpret. There are several reasons for this. First, there are substantially different interpretative approaches on the overall timing of the book. Some see most of it as purely historical. Some see most of it as yet future. Second, there are many Old Testament allusions in Revelation. Allusions are phrases and references to the Old Testament without an explicit statement by John that he is quoting the Old Testament. So when John refers to the Old Testament he generally does not tell you he is doing so. Third, there is a greater use of symbolic language in Revelation than in other parts of the Bible. Revelation is in a form of literature known as apocalyptic.6 How can one get started? First, the book of Revelation promises a blessing to the one who reads it (Rev 1:3). So we should read it even if we do not completely understand everything. The basic thrust of Revelation’s message is clear. Jesus is coming again and will defeat the forces of evil. We can be assured of this. Other interpretative helps that can be given would be to interpret the seven churches as seven historical churches in existence in the first century A.D (Rev 2-3). Interpret chapter 4 onward as primarily future events from our perspective (Rev 1:18-19).7 Follow a generally chronological view of the book from chapter 4 sequencing the bowls, trumpets and seals, second coming of Jesus, millennial kingdom and eternal state. Use a study Bible with a good set of notes to help frame common interpretations and Old Testament backgrounds. Lastly, become a student of the book and keep working at it. Conclusion and Summary Biblical passages must be interpreted according to the intention of the author and in the context in which the statement is made. Interpretation must be distinguished from application. One must be sensitive to what type of literature one is in and how this may or may not apply to a believer in the church age. Interpreting the Bible is sometimes hard work but it’s always worth the cost. David reminds us of the value of God’s word, “They are of greater value than gold, than even a great amount of pure gold; they bring greater delight than honey, than even the sweetest honey from a honeycomb” (Ps 19:10). Discussion Questions A prophecy is a message inspired by God, a divine revelation. The Bible says that prophets “spoke from God as they were moved by holy spirit.” (2 Peter 1:20, 21) So a prophet is one who receives God's message and transmits it to others.—Acts 3:18 Bible prophecy or biblical prophecy comprises the passages of the Bible that re